the hottest immigration tracker |
| Got questions on U.S. immigration? |
 |
|
|
|
| |
| AOS Interview: Cleared
|
|
| User: |
rksgc |
Labor Filing Date: |
20 Jul 2002 |
|
| I-485 Received Date: |
29 Jun 2007 |
Transferred to NBC: |
|
|
| Interview Notice Issued: |
|
Interview Notice Received: |
|
|
| Interview Date: |
05 Mar 2008 |
Interview Location: |
Newark, NJ |
|
| Interview Status: |
cleared |
Nationality: |
India |
|
| Interview Experience: |
Hi,
I�m the primary applicant and my wife was the derivative.
The officer had loads of question for me. She went on asking for things that were 8 to 10 years old, my company's clients (which I couldn�t recall). I felt most of the officer's questions were a bit ambitious, officer wasn't very specific. Initially I thought I was nervous and stumbling. After few questions, I realized the questions were in fact confusion.
My wife had a bit of tough time as well. She is currently on training in London, and visits me every month for a week to two. Apparently, the officer didn't like that and the there were lot of arguments from our side (including my attorney). At the end she basically shut us by saying we are unable to establish the spouse doesn't reside with her husband and that she is going to move the file to her supervisor for the review.
It got concluded with the officer requesting a review by senior/supervisor and we wait until we hear from them. It's been two weeks now and no LUDS nor RFE.
Also, the dates aren't current for EB3 (my PD is July 2002), we just have to wait and see if they are going to request anything.
Hope �not hearing� from them means good. SO, I have set the interview status as cleared.
Thanks!
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
| Last Updated: |
17 Mar 2008 |
|
|
 |
Watch this case |
| If you watch this case, we will notify you every time the applicant updates the case details, or when a user adds a comment to it. |
| Users currently watching this case: none |
|
 |
Add a comment |
| When you add a comment, (1) we will notify the applicant so he/she can respond, and (2) you will begin to watch this case. |
|
