U.S. Immigration Tracker
the hottest immigration tracker
Dimitar Michailov, Immigration Attorney James Mayock, Immigration Attorney Gregory Vartanian, Immigration Attorney
Got questions on U.S. immigration? Ask an immigration lawyer
The Waiting Lounge | RSS Feeds for Discussions | Home | Add My Case | Sign Up | Log In
USA
Canada
UK
India
Discussion
Online Chat
News!
Resources
 
Discussion Forums: Atlanta PERM
Back to Forum Add a New Post  
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25 

26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50 

51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67 
Topic: Whats wrong with ATL PERM Center
Posted by cooldown (114) 31 Jul 2007
one more approval
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
You are right... So we need more cases approval....
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
Sorry guys, Excel pastes it like this above. Here's what I notice:

1. 193 total people got approval since Jan 07, only who applied in 07 (not including oct,nov.dec approvals)
2. jan. feb . mar apr were SO SO So So F** ed up, they were almost all for H2Bs , as they claim.
3. Jun: total = 49, 29 from Feb apps, rest scattered.
4. Jul: total 109, 15 from feb, 68 from Mar, 15 from apr, suprizingly 11 from May.
5. Also, as you may notice, for the whole month of Jul they were doing Mar.

If they take 1 month to do 1 month worth of apps, we are screwed.

See below,

Approval/Denial Date Grand Total
7/2/2007 4
7/3/2007 7
7/5/2007 5
7/6/2007 5
7/7/2007 1
7/9/2007 4
7/10/2007 6
7/11/2007 7
7/12/2007 8
7/13/2007 1
7/16/2007 5
7/17/2007 4
7/18/2007 3
7/19/2007 2
7/20/2007 6
7/23/2007 1
7/24/2007 5
7/25/2007 2
7/26/2007 5
7/27/2007 17
7/30/2007 10
7/31/2007 1
Grand Total 109


scattered numbers all over Jul, but 27th, 30th is like wooh!

KEEP IT UP GUYS. SEND N ADD!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by cooldown (114) 31 Jul 2007
Guys don't waste your time in analysis just send email.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by ps57002 (421) 31 Jul 2007
1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12 ps57002

Sorry haven't been able to help yesterday...was taking flight back to NY...then had to install my hard drive..had no comp...so now am on board...as of today i am still "in process" and hope I and others get approval in due time...

I will be sending out emails today too....
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
cooldown,

Sent emails man. Dont even feel like working in the office either. So wasting time on shit like this. Actually, shit like LC, we are all hard working people facing this shit, and illegal people dont even worry abt things like this. well, thats life. :-).

But, if all of us together keep sending it works, so COM'ON GUYS. SEND N ADD!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dbhutani (11) 31 Jul 2007
Can you post the email content as well as email addresses again for DOL employees? I just joined this conversation. Thanks
(reply) (report this)
Posted by lifestyle (28) 31 Jul 2007
Just did an email blast.

1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12) lifestyle (4 ids)
(reply) (report this)
Posted by cooldown (114) 31 Jul 2007
Yes you are right buddy and the most weird thing is when i compare myself with chicago perm applicants. The have applied their LC on 29/30 july and they still have hope to apply 485
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
:-)

Looks like they are up to Apr now, both apprvls today are apr. hope to see more n more. BUT the randomness of dates is scary. if you start seeing 4.1, 4.2 its cool, at least you know what they are doing. this 4.15, 4.7 is f*** crazy.

Hoping for the best!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
Mr. Bhutani,

Please go to page 19, 18 of this forum. You will see a list of 100 email addresses and text of email, use your imagination for Subj line though.

good luck man, welcome!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by gcgcgcgc (32) 31 Jul 2007
Whats left behind is left behind. Lokks like that is the approach they are following. There's no scope for HOPE. Only luck prevails. Good Luck to ALL!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
3 approvals so far

all apr 4.3,13,15. keep it up ATL!
(reply) (report this)
Posted by vdlrao (246) 31 Jul 2007
gcgcgcgc,


Ask your lawyer/employer to emal/fax/cal dol and you also fax/email/call. Hope you find luck.

Thanks.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by pcsankar73 (138) 31 Jul 2007
Just an update . My friend who applied with me ojn same date got it certified yesterday ... he sent a fax with his details and asking to b procesed as pending for 100 days ... he sent it last week wednesday and he got approved yesterday .. so i am planning to send mine .. not sure this will work... only tricky part is ..he sent with the details like a employer requesting & faxed it and provided all employer contact like fax & phone there

My guess is since its a fax and looks lke a employer requesting , they have taken the appl or might be a random pick which conincided with the fax ... ... Not Sure this works ... but worth a try ... i am planning to do it too ...any advise/experience or thoughts pls welcome ... Just not to miss a trick at the end of the day ...
(reply) (report this)
Posted by JayPerm (63) 31 Jul 2007
It might be a random pick .... and the fax may have helped ... not bad trying it out ..in my opininon...
(reply) (report this)
Posted by ps57002 (421) 31 Jul 2007
am continuing emails....

Hoping and praying...
(reply) (report this)
Posted by lucky29 (5) 31 Jul 2007
1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12) lifestyle (4 ids)
13) lucky29
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rakib123 (103) 31 Jul 2007
yes bro may be it will work. my employer sent email last week with details and asked explanation why its still pending over 90 days?

you could try.......

but make sure......... your lawyer/employer must be the sender
(reply) (report this)
Posted by lctracker (31) 31 Jul 2007
I think it is worth a try.....
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
pcsankar,

Fax is certainly worth a try. Can you please post fax # and text? Will greatly appreciate it.

Thanks,
D.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
As usual wasting time, found this:

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified and bla bla bla.

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by ps57002 (421) 31 Jul 2007
Approval/Denial Date Grand Total
7/2/2007 4
7/3/2007 7
7/5/2007 5
7/6/2007 5
7/7/2007 1
7/9/2007 4
7/10/2007 6
7/11/2007 7
7/12/2007 8
7/13/2007 1
7/16/2007 5
7/17/2007 4
7/18/2007 3
7/19/2007 2
7/20/2007 6
7/23/2007 1
7/24/2007 5
7/25/2007 2
7/26/2007 5
7/27/2007 17 (Feb/march/april/may)
7/30/2007 10 (march/april)
7/31/2007 3 (all april so far)

i am on call to change air tkt paying 1000 bucks to change...taking risk...my approval better come. i am EB3..so feel more hopeless
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
******************************************
As usual wasting time, found this:

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified and bla bla bla.

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.
**************************************************

Atlanta doesn't follow the law ..... Shall we include above in our email draft????
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
rakib, yours was apr begining. they DID start doing apr, so it may hv just coincided with the fax, but i guess, as long as the result is good, who cares what worked. we should just keep doing our efforts.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
i know rutgers, thats why WE are wasting time and energy on this. life.......

i wish we could remind this to them somehow...

:-|
(reply) (report this)
Posted by vdlrao (246) 31 Jul 2007
Hai Guys,

Please include now on wards in all our emais this thing. That helps us a lot. Thanks dsikka for the information.
________________________________________________________
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified and bla bla bla.

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
I think the hugh text that we have in our email, people have read it already. this is what i suggest:

send to all 100 people in our addressbook the following

_____________________________________
Subj: Federal Regulation = JOKE of 2007

TEXT:

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

..... If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified and ......

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.

Desparately waiting for DOL-ATL to follow the rules.

Thanks You,

PERM Applicants
DOL, ATL

_________________________________________

and that should be it, no one wants to see other crap anymore.

what do you guys say?
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
Dear Sir / Madam,

This is regarding the labor certification process at the Atlanta PERM Processing Center. Atlanta PERM Processing Center doesn't follow the Federal Regulation as below.

*********************************
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified ......

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.
*********************************

The DOL is not seem to be processing applications in a timebound manner. Most applications are older than 90 days and are still pending without being processed.

We can understand the above mentioned facts as we are part of a forum of Atlanta Perm Applicants. and pls find below the contrast details of the 2 processing centers in handling our applications.

Atlanta Perm tracker : http://www.trackitt.com/usa-immigration-trackers/atlanta-perm-tracker/
Chicago Perm Tracker : http://www.trackitt.com/usa-immigration-trackers/chicago-perm-tracker/
Chicago vs. Atlanta
Chicago Mean (Days) 12.7, number of observattions 111
Atlanta Mean (Days) 103.2, number of observattions 66
Above analysis based on a sample of cases filed to Chicago and Atlanta centers (from trackitt.com) since March 2007

Pls make it fair enough for all applicants and resolve this issue as early as possible.

As a legal, tax-paying and productive members of society, many careers are stalled by this seemingly never ending unfair wait in the American legal immigration system and is very discouraging and possibly detrimental to the interest of the American global economy in the 21st century.

Also Just wanted to bring this posting in the web site to your attention: http://www.immigration-law.com
The same message from the web site has been copied here for a quick reference:

==================================================================

07/24/2007: USCIS Generous Interpretation of Priority Date Based July 2007 EB-485 Filing Eligibility and Our Urge for OFLC's Certification of PERM Applications Before 08/17/2007

The USCIS FAQ indicates that those who filed a PERM application in July 2007 establishing his/her priority date and and will receive cerification of these PERM applications will be eligible to file a concurrent I-140/EB-485 application on or before August 17, 2007. The current DOS and USCIS actions following the July 2007 VB fiasco is giving a life-time opportunity for these filers to file EB-485 applications such that during the forthcoming long backlogs in adjudication of their applications, they could at least work and travel internationally using EAD and Advance Parole, and when they should be laid off, they could still complete the green card process inasmuch as they would find a similar job after 180 days of filing of the EB-485 applications. We thus urge the leaders of the Office of Foreign Labor Certification, particularly Dr. William Carlson, Chief of the National Program of U.S. Department of Labor, to acclerate the July PERM applications such that they are certified at least within the first two weeks of August 2007. We also urge the AILA to work with the OFLC to seek such cooperation from the agency. As affected by the surge of H-2B applications, we understand that Atlanta National Processing Center has been experiencing some delays in the processing of PERM applications and we strongly urge the Atlanta Center leaders to consider the current exigent circumstances and to accelerate the July 2007 cases adjudication within the next two weeks. Those who should desperately seek such help will include:
Those who have already filed and are waiting for the certification at this time.
Those who will file the PERM application on or before July 31, 2007 in the next one week. Those employers who will complete the required recruitment process by July 31, 2007 should make it sure that the PERM applications be filed online "on or before" July 31, 2007 so that once the PERM application is certified in the first two weeks of August, they submit the concurrent I-140 and EB-485 applications "swfitly" not missing the deadline of August 17, 2007. These aliens may also want to prepare for such potential opportunity and start collection of required supporting documentation in preparation for the situation. This will be particularly true for EB-3 filers as they are the ones who will suffer the most from the upcoming severe visa retrogression in coming years.
We thank in advance for Dr. Carlson's special attention to this request on behalf of the U.S. employers and the foreign workers.

=======================================================================

we would be very grateful if this issue can be addressed quickly.

Thanking you in advance,
Best Regards,


PERM.DFLC@dol.gov,
secretaryelainechao@dol.gov,
PLC.Atlanta@dol.gov,
etapagemaster@dol.gov,
carlson.william@dol.gov,
plc.chicago@dol.gov,
jbeverly@doleta.gov,
pasternak.brian@dol.gov,
Jean-Pierre.Isabel@dol.gov,
Henderson.Mada@dol.gov,
aberd@berdklauss.com,
prakash.khatri@dhs.gov,
Cisombudsman@dhs.gov,
adjibodou.renata@dol.gov,
law@murthy.com,
info@immigrationvoice.org,
letters@washpost.com,
newstip@wsbtv.com,
b.grueskin@wsj.com,
j.heller@wsj.com,
t.cullen@wsj.com,
j.fry@wsj.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com,
bizday@nytimes.com,
foreign@nytimes.com,
metro@nytimes.com,
national@nytimes.com,
washington@nytimes.com,
executive-editor@nytimes.com,
managing-editor@nytimes.com,
nytnews@nytimes.com,
oped@nytimes.com,
editorial@nytimes.com,
national@washpost.com,
foreign@washpost.com,
letters@nypost.com,
Michael.Chertoff@dhs.gov,
Michael.Jackson@dhs.gov,
Paul.Schneider@dhs.gov,
Robert.Jamison@dhs.gov,
Jay.Cohen@dhs.gov,
Gus.Coldebella@dhs.gov,
Stewart.Baker@dhs.gov,
Charles.Allen@dhs.gov,
Ralph.Basham@dhs.gov,
Mark.Sullivan@dhs.gov,
Thad.Allen@dhs.gov,
Julie.Myers@dhs.gov,
David.Paulison@dhs.gov,
Kip.Hawley@dhs.gov,
Emilio.Gonzalez@dhs.gov,
Chad.Sweet@dhs.gov,
Richard.Skinner@dhs.gov,
Daniel.Sutherland@dhs.gov,
Connie.Patrick@dhs.gov,
Daniel.Lloyd@dhs.gov,
Jeffrey.Runge@dhs.gov,
Roger.Rufe@dhs.gov,
Vayl.Oxford@dhs.gov,
Edward.Fox@dhs.gov,
Hugo.Teufel@dhs.gov,
Donald.Kent@dhs.gov,
Prakash.Khatri@dhs.gov,
Donald.Powell@dhs.gov,
Gregory.Garcia@dhs.gov,
Alfonso.Martinez-Fonts@dhs.gov,
Robert.Stephan@dhs.gov,
Richard.Barth@dhs.gov,
Eric.Fagerholm@dhs.gov,
Anne.Petera@dhs.gov,
Uttam.Dhillon@dhs.gov,
David.Norquist@dhs.gov,
Donald.Bathurst@dhs.gov,
Marta.Perez@dhs.gov,
Scott.Charbo@dhs.gov,
Elaine.Duke@dhs.gov,
Jerry.Williams@dhs.gov,
Swoope.Anthony@doleta.gov ,
Flynn.Maria@doleta.gov ,
McNelly.Jennifer@doleta.gov ,
cantor.Erica@doleta.gov ,
atkinson.Cheryl@doleta.gov ,
gilbert.Gay@doleta.gov ,
bishop.Mason@doleta.gov ,
small.Douglas@doleta.gov ,
derocco.Emily@doleta.gov ,
carlson.William@doleta.gov ,
walsh.Eileen@doleta.gov ,
jacobs-simmons.Lenita@doleta.gov ,
parker.Helen@doleta.gov ,
juarez.Joseph@doleta.gov ,
zuidema.Byron@doleta.gov,
trigg.Richard@doleta.gov,
Condoleezza.rice@state.gov,
Laura.lineberry@state.gov,
Brian.gunderson@state.gov,
Ruth.elliott@state.gov,
Kelley.irey@state.gov,
Brian.besanceney@state.gov,
Linda.dewan@state.gov,
Robert.beecroft@state.gov,
Christopher.quade@state.gov,
Sarah.beran@state.gov,
Colby.cooper@state.gov,
Anne.lyons@state.gov,
Daniel.fogarty@state.gov,
Harry.thomas@state.gov,
Kenneth.merten@state.gov,
Kevin.whitaker@state.gov,
Mary.warlick@state.gov,
Uzra.zeya@state.gov,
Taylor.ruggles@state.gov,
Saadia.sarkis@state.gov,
Clarence.finney@state.gov,
Barbara.hambrick@state.gov,
Brenda.horton@state.gov,
Samuel.mcelhaney@state.gov,
Charles.alexander@state.gov,
John.bass@state.gov,
Julieta.noyes@state.gov,
Jeffrey.moon@state.gov,
Mari.tolliver@state.gov,
William.pilcher@state.gov,
Carol.perez@state.gov,
Frank.ledahawsky@state.gov,
Cynthia.motley@state.gov,
Reginald.green@state.gov,
Christopher.corso@state.gov,
Daniel.mcle@state.gov,
Dean.thompson@state.gov,
John.bentel@state.gov,
Mark.horowitz@state.gov,
Cindy.almodovar@state.gov,
(reply) (report this)
Posted by vdlrao (246) 31 Jul 2007
Subj: Federal Regulation = Is it really being obliged by DOL?

TEXT:

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2004 / Rules and Regulations

..... If an application has not been selected for audit, and satisfies all other reviews, the application will be certified and returned to the employer. The employer must immediately sign the application and then submit the certified application to DHS in support of an employment-based I–140 petition. We anticipate an electronically filed application not selected for audit will have a computer-generated decision within 45 to 60 days of the date the application was initially filed.
If an application is selected for audit, the employer will be notified and ......

ref: page 4, center column, 1st paragraph.

Desparately waiting for DOL-ATL to follow the rules.

Thanks You,

PERM Applicants
DOL, ATL
(reply) (report this)
Posted by pcsankar73 (138) 31 Jul 2007
elow is the letter draft from my collegue .... let me know if this is worth a effort

To:
DOL National Processing Center - Atlanta
Help Desk #11

Subject: Enquiring on an EB2 Application.

Dear Sir / Madam,

First of all we would like to thank you for the email response regarding the Case number: A-XXXXX-XXXXX Dated: XX/XX/XXXX and mentioning the
official correspondence if forth coming. Since The application is more than 100 days old , we would like to get an response and
a status update to proceed with further steps in the GC processing.

As we have only couple of days time window to apply for the next steps of the above mentioned applicant's GC process and
the applicant being one of our valuable employees, we are eagerly waiting for this application through for further steps.

We appreciate your earlier approval of the above mentioned application.


Thanking you in Advance,
Best Regards,
Employee Details - Address
Employer Phone : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Employer Fax : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
pcsankar,

good n simple. thanks. of course this goes on employer letterhead and from him and NOT beneficiary, right?
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
rutgers,

please edit the list above. all doleta ids (most imp ones) are firstname.lastname and NOT last.first. Please edit. thanks for the email draft.

so people, when does version 2 blasting session start ????????????????????
(reply) (report this)
Posted by pcsankar73 (138) 31 Jul 2007
def'ly he did not sent that with a letter head ..he faxed it from his client place ..just a normal paper .... so i am not sure this can work ... but you cannot make this happen through an employer ... so worth a try ... it also looks to be very good for me too..
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
can you post the updated email ids? I can change them... thanks...
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
heres doleta IDs

Swoope.Anthony@doleta.gov
Flynn.Maria@doleta.gov
McNelly.Jennifer@doleta.gov
cantor.Erica@doleta.gov
atkinson.Cheryl@doleta.gov
gilbert.Gay@doleta.gov
bishop.Mason@doleta.gov
small.Douglas@doleta.gov
derocco.Emily@doleta.gov
carlson.William@doleta.gov
walsh.Eileen@doleta.gov
jacobs-simmons.Lenita@doleta.gov
parker.Helen@doleta.gov
juarez.Joseph@doleta.gov
zuidema.Byron@doleta.gov
trigg.Richard@doleta.gov
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
thanks.. I already update them as above....
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12) lifestyle (4 ids)
13) lucky29
14) rutgersll
15)
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dbangad (35) 31 Jul 2007
E-mail has been sent to all,

Did any of you got approval today, mine is pending since april first week

pls advice
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12) lifestyle (4 ids)
13) lucky29
14) rutgersll
15) dbangad
16)
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
Condoleezza.rice@state.gov,
Laura.lineberry@state.gov,
Brian.gunderson@state.gov,
Ruth.elliott@state.gov,
Kelley.irey@state.gov,
Brian.besanceney@state.gov,
Linda.dewan@state.gov,
Robert.beecroft@state.gov,
Christopher.quade@state.gov,
Sarah.beran@state.gov,
Colby.cooper@state.gov,
Anne.lyons@state.gov,
Daniel.fogarty@state.gov,
Harry.thomas@state.gov,
Kenneth.merten@state.gov,
Kevin.whitaker@state.gov,
Mary.warlick@state.gov,
Uzra.zeya@state.gov,
Taylor.ruggles@state.gov,
Saadia.sarkis@state.gov,
Clarence.finney@state.gov,
Barbara.hambrick@state.gov,
Brenda.horton@state.gov,
Samuel.mcelhaney@state.gov,
Charles.alexander@state.gov,
John.bass@state.gov,
Julieta.noyes@state.gov,
Jeffrey.moon@state.gov,
Mari.tolliver@state.gov,
William.pilcher@state.gov,
Carol.perez@state.gov,
Frank.ledahawsky@state.gov,
Cynthia.motley@state.gov,
Reginald.green@state.gov,
Christopher.corso@state.gov,
Daniel.mcle@state.gov,
Dean.thompson@state.gov,
John.bentel@state.gov,
Mark.horowitz@state.gov,
Cindy.almodovar@state.gov,
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
looks like DHS ids have the same err. i will correct them. rugters, can you please then put all doleta, dol, dhs, state, media IN ONE HUGH LIST AGAIN? thanks
(reply) (report this)
Posted by rutgersll (153) 31 Jul 2007
the state ids were updated ...
(reply) (report this)
Posted by cooldown (114) 31 Jul 2007
got this reply

"Cohen, Jay (LAS TSO)" to me
show details 7:39 am (6 hours ago)

You have not reached your intended party please check your address, thank you LTSO Jay Cohen
(reply) (report this)
Posted by dsik (247) 31 Jul 2007
pcsankar,

can you post fax # also. thanks.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by maverick09 (4) 31 Jul 2007
1. rutgersll
2. Cooldown
3. rutgersll (new email id)
4. h12gc (sent emails)
5. DSIKKA
6. lctracker
7. gcwaiting2007
8) lctracker
9) lastchance07
10)my421
11)ravis
12) lifestyle (4 ids)
13) lucky29
14) rutgersll
15) dbangad
16)maverick09
17)
(reply) (report this)
Posted by jitinsun (22) 31 Jul 2007
My case is pending since 03/08/2007. My case was filed under EB3.....and still waiting for approval. There are cases being approved which were filed even in April. So I am not sure what kind of a sequence they are following.
(reply) (report this)
Posted by cooldown (114) 31 Jul 2007
nobody knows, send emails to the list provided by Atlanta victims
(reply) (report this)
Posted by pcsankar73 (138) 31 Jul 2007
(404) 893-4642
(reply) (report this)
Users currently subscribed this discussion: crusader, mssk, alexberd, pulungo90, alnark71, mary1978, GCanand, reddysms, gcdreams, johnifanx98, anurakt, eternity, dbangad, sundarmit, Dream, lahrira, franklee20, kittyz, pcsankar73, CrossGC, nenina, raomrb, keylemO, buri, zgsh, tright, konda, toosensitive, peltonwheel, danc, LuckyGreen, random, rutgersll, akhan16, cellneuron, reddysms12, ashutrip, zzjjmmtt, happyboy, mshahbazuddin, moh02162007, hurricane, 23skidoo, shun666, dabmu, crescent, smwarriar, wwzz, kodavaak, PD20024ever, sasa, sarun, bigtiger, bigboss, lctracker, waiting2007, MYGC2007, Mobile2007, messege12307, lifestyle, royalgc, gbmsz, gconwait4long, arnab221, Cheerup6, vdlrao, greybear, smartscoobie, crazyperm, Manam, rakib123, incir, gangleader, Junecat, S1115, trackPH, gcgcgcgc, spd123, ernest, dsik, raghugogi, bigtime007, brathee, choprarr, h12gc, Question1, 0307perm, gauoti, GcWaiting2007, hopepl, sps1, permmania, perming, angelo, ps57002, pshah, plhelpus, hshira, atperm, cooldown, jr8671, permatl, cherry57, SRR81, sachint, qshtyf, desigun, neo235, GreenMe, gcindia76, april26atlanta, bubloo, valuablehurdle, spreddy, maverick09, hemantahire, newguy, Abc1234, Cholan, amal, dubukku, 0710perm, imongc, nareshkan, permme, CatchTheBall, cheeduv, computergig21, my421, ravis, lucky29, Adsj, tzones77, JayPerm, yoyo12, gcfever1, iHate, aprilperm, ipkus, ganvenkar, cfayahoo, jitinsun, zjiang, bhiti, joeatl, WhyMe, machi6, seasa, hopefull, dxmdxm, v021643, jaiAtlanta, dima, Cunundrum, Jesusisgod, perm0525, shanta
Back to Forum Add a New Post  
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25 

26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50 

51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67