close
Do you like trackitt?
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for multiple tickers per page!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for right-to-left languages!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for loading content via an RSS feed!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has an optional fade effect between items!
  • New updates have been made to jQuery News Ticker! Check below for more details!
  • jQuery News Ticker is now compatible with jQuery 1.3.2! See below for further details and for latest download.
  • Further updates to jQuery News Ticker are coming soon!

Member Profile: Kumar786 (12 posts)

Advertisement    
 
Hello, I'm Kumar786 (report this user)
I am from India
I last logged in on 29 Oct 2015
I have been a member since 05 Nov 2014
I have added 12 posts in trackitt forums
I added my last post on 29 Oct 2015
Kumar786's Posts
Posted in I-140 Forum on 29 Oct 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Nice job Brahmatan, disappointed with AILA (but would be surprised otherwise). IV has again proven to be genuine. I hope this works out sooner than later.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 06 Oct 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

What happened to the promised rule for i140 EAD in October?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 01 Oct 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Commented on the thread. This doesn't look like the EAD rule, it is critical nevertheless. If i140 is portable, it will give a lot of freedom to move around and not be bound to an employer for the fear of restarting the GC clock. EAD is the next step but even that would be meaningless unless this is in place. Thanks for the good work here guys and gals.. i have been commenting (sending emails etc) and also following this thread for the latest. Here is what the confirmation says-

Agency: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Document Type: Nonrulemaking
Title: Agency Information Collection Activities: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, Form I-140; Extension, Without Change, of a Currently Approved Collection
Document ID: USCIS-2007-0018-0034

If this is non rule making with a notice period of 60 days, does that mean that it will be in effect just after 60 days? Anyone knows? Please comment
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 28 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

oh ok, thanks
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 28 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

BTW no forward movement in August Visa Bulletin :(

After POTUS/WH announcement on 7/22 I was hoping for some activity especially when the document said "later this year"..
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 28 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Yes, thank you. I was planning to include those. However, it is weird that the regulations.gov site is displaying "Comments Not Accepted"..does anyone know why?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 28 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

I got the same email. Did anyone reply to you? Is there any template which we can use for comments that covers everything in regards to this? Please let me know.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 10 Mar 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Why only democrats for awareness? I just supported the bill but all the congressmen are republicans in my constituency so I sent a letter to them through Open Congress. Is that an issue?

Also, the letter says "As a constituent.."- are we technically considered as "constituents" being legal immigrants? Please let me know.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-765 (EAD) Forum on 17 Nov 2014
Topic: EAD for H4 Visa Holders

Great news! but what is the source of this? Is 250K sufficient to make the dates current? And for how long. Does anyone know?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-765 (EAD) Forum on 14 Nov 2014
Topic: EAD for H4 Visa Holders

My friend, democrats or republicans- it doesn't matter. This is all politics at this point driven by 2016 and the sheer numbers. I was dismayed to see no relief for legal people in the rumored EO. You will be wasting your money- just remember what have republicans done so far for legals- no matter what they say. Romney was our best hope- at least he seemed to understand the positive impacts that legal immigration can bring to economy and hence to the entire society. I am hoping that the rumors are wrong and someone in Presidents council has some sense. Please email and tweet nevertheless.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-765 (EAD) Forum on 05 Nov 2014
Topic: EAD for H4 Visa Holders

If this gets stuck in dirty politics (which it probably will), it will not pass. But I guess, we need to persevere. Dems punted on any action, it backfired, now Reps are trying to twist it to look like winners. What will happen next, perhaps would be a wild guess. I would "like" to think though that we have a chance either way as long as people look at cold numbers and not get swayed by imaginary theories. More Educated population == Better Economy, period. I know that most of the people from India and China would start businesses and buy homes if not for the unclear immigration picture. People have to understand that we are NOT taking jobs but helping create more. There is a small number of well educated and unemployed citizens, but people on work visa know that they get first preference everywhere (if they apply). Wages are equal(if not more) for everyone- so the whole myth of H1s working for cheap is baseless. Let's hope someone is thinking right in Washington (i know too much to expect :))
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-765 (EAD) Forum on 05 Nov 2014
Topic: EAD for H4 Visa Holders

I think we are mixing two things here. I recall the presidential debate where Romney said that his(read Rep) vision of immigration was to staple GCs to STEM holders, while the President kept referring to the amnesty to illegal immigrants. While I see his point, I dont think that Reps are averse to solving the issue. In my mind these are 2 very different things and Republicans are opposed to illegals but they have a rational approach towards legal immigrants being productive members of the society. It also goes to reinforce their capitalistic image. So it would be not accurate to assume that a Senate and House controlled by Reps would be averse to solve the legal immigration and by that correlation give a boost to economy. As a matter of fact, if it becomes a bilateral decision, the legal issues may be the front runners instead of being on the sidelines. Just my 2 cents. Let's hope for the best.
I don't like this postI like this post