Discuss rck2009's I-140 USCIS Case

I-140 case:
Nepal
primary
Texas
EB1A
29 Apr 2009
01 May 2009
01 May 2009
concurrent
regular
yes
06 Aug 2009
Detailed further evidence needed
denied
03 Nov 2009
188 days
02 Nov 2009
08 May 2009
14 Nov 2009
Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, part 204.5 (h)(2), states in part: �Extrordinary ability means ���who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.� Your documentation fails to sufficiently show that you have r


Watch this case

Watch this case
If you watch this case, we will notify you every time the applicant updates the case details, or when a user adds a comment to it.
Users currently watching this case: bizdak, close2gc, rck2009, raaj, hopefulforgc 6 Comments

Posted by close2gc
21 May 2009 #1
Hello. Did you get your Finger Print Request notice and how soon did you get it after you filed the applications and how much time they assigned you to get finger prints done? Good luck for quick GC approval
Posted by rck2009
21 May 2009 #2
Hi CrazyforGC, I got the notice for fingerprinting in two weeks with just a week to go for it. Thanks
Posted by rck2009
13 Aug 2009 #3
Here is my RFE:
Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, part 204.5 (h)(2), states in part:
“Extrordinary ability means ………who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.” Your documentation fails to sufficiently show that you have risen to the top of your field of endeavor. Therefore, you must submit detailed additional evidence that clearly demonstrates that you have sustained national or international acclaim and that your achievements have been recognized as extraordinary by others in the field.

If the evidence includes awards or prizes, explain the reputation of the organization granting the award, the significance of the award, and the criteria used to select the recipient.

If the evidence includes memberships in associations in the field, submit evidence of the membership criteria.

If the evidence includes published material about your work, it must clearly indicate that the work is significant. An unevaluated listing in a subject matter index or footnote, or a reference to the work without evaluation is insufficient.

If the evidence includes participation as a judge of the work of others in the field, explain the criteria for selection as a panelist, reviewer, etc.

If the evidence includes original scientific, scholarly, athletic or business-related contributions, submit evidence of the importance of such contributions to the field. Evidence that those outside of your circle of colleagues and acquaintance consider the work is especially valuable.

If the evidence includes authorship of scholarly articles, explain the significance of the publications in which they appeared.

I am looking for some good help in responding to these queries. I had focused on the last three of the evidences when I filed my petition. Authorship in 26 peer reviewed articles, 23 as first author, reviewer (3) and editorial board member (2) for some of the best journals in the field, and 5 letters of recom about the contribution in the field. Decen
Posted by raaj
19 Aug 2009 #4
you have good chance but you need a very very positive attorney.

raaj
Posted by raaj
19 Aug 2009 #5
you have good chance but you need a very very positive attorney.

raaj
Posted by hopefulforgc
14 Oct 2009 #6
Could you share your credentials???Is your PhD from US.

Thanks
ram

Add a comment

When you add a comment, (1) we will notify the applicant so he/she can respond, and (2) you will begin to watch this case.